- Navigating SEO
- Posts
- Core Web Vitals: The Ranking Factor Everyone Overreacts To
Core Web Vitals: The Ranking Factor Everyone Overreacts To
Why CWV should guide your decisions, not dictate them.
John Sukowaty
November 17, 2025 • Estimated Reading Time: 6 minutes
 | TL;DR: Core Web Vitals matter, but not in the way most discussions present them. They are a health check, not a primary ranking engine. Once you cross the “good enough” threshold, over-optimizing stops returning value. CWV should inform your decisions, not control them. User experience drives rankings — the numbers only point to where friction might exist. |
Recommended Links: Connect on LinkedIn | SEO Consultant
Table of Contents
What Does This Mean For SEO?
CWV is a signal, not a ranking strategy
The industry treats Core Web Vitals like a master ranking lever. It isn’t. CWV doesn’t operate like a switch that instantly pushes your pages up or down. It’s more like a pulse check.
It tells you if the experience feels unstable or frustrating. If it does, user behavior will reflect that, and Google responds to the behavior, not the score.
Microsoft Clarity is a free screen recording tool you can install to see where the frustrations are on your website.
Lighthouse is a lab test; CrUX is reality
Your Lighthouse score might say “flawless,” but that doesn’t matter if real users experience something slower. CrUX is the dataset that influences Google's interpretation.
That’s why chasing perfect Lighthouse scores often misleads teams. You’re tuning a screenshot, not reality.
Why Lighthouse Creates False Confidence
Lighthouse runs in a controlled environment with near-perfect conditions. No network congestion. No weak devices. No bloated third-party scripts throttling the browser.
Real users don’t live in that world. That’s why sites with great Lighthouse scores still feel slow in the real world, and why you should treat Lighthouse like a tool, not a truth.
I covered this mindset earlier when breaking down why Lighthouse data is only one piece of the story.
“Mostly green” is not a cop-out — it’s the correct target
Independent studies show diminishing returns the moment CWV crosses into “good” territory. Everything past that line is performance theater.
There’s no ranking benefit for being fast just for the sake of being fast. The value lies in removing friction, not racing for perfection. Google will not rank a fast website over one that is more helpful.
The risk isn’t mediocre CWV — it’s ignoring genuine red flags
Poor CWV can absolutely tank engagement. But the danger isn’t the number. It’s the behavior that number represents: hesitation, jitter, stalls, delayed taps, shifting layouts. Those moments change how people use your site. Google simply picks up the signal.
Here’s Google’s own explanation of what Core Web Vitals actually measure.
What Can I Do About It?
Use CWV as a map of possible pain, not a judgment of quality
Treat CWV the same way you treat analytics: directional, not absolute. If LCP or INP dips, investigate. If CLS spikes, there’s friction. CWV should guide where you look for problems, not command what you fix.
Stop the perfection loop and focus on meaningful gains
Once Core Web Vitals are “good,” shift your time to structural wins. Semantic organization, clear sectioning, better internal linking SEO, and dependable navigation all produce more SEO impact than spending 40 hours shaving 50 milliseconds off LCP.
Fix the problems people actually notice
Users don’t feel a 0.2 second improvement in a lab score. They do feel:
• unexpected layout jumps
• stuck buttons
• slow taps
• large hero images loading last
• scripts freezing the page
Choose improvements that make those pain points disappear. That’s where CWV has real power, not in the perfect score.
Final Thoughts on topic
Core Web Vitals should never be the reason you make a strategic decision. They should be the reason you investigate one. CWV reveals symptoms, not solutions.
If your scores are mostly green and the site feels stable, you’ve crossed the line where CWV stops being an SEO advantage and becomes a maintenance metric. The work that truly moves rankings still sits in structure, clarity, meaning, and usefulness.
Use CWV as a data point. Make decisions from the experience it represents.
